I just noticed an interesting statement in this Business Insider article titled “LinkedIn is Going to Compete with Twitter“:

LinkedIn’s main problem is that, as it says itself in its S-1 filing, the vast majority of LinkedIn members don’t actually use it. To be blunt: it’s just not useful for the majority of users. It’s only a minority of people like recruiters and salespeople who use the site.

The actual statement from LinkedIn’s Initial Public Offering filing is the following (quoting from this article):

the number of our registered members is higher than the number of actual members, and a substantial majority of our page views are generated by a minority of our members.

Isn’t that interesting? This has me wondering what people could use if LinkedIn wasn’t around? Facebook is more personal but the BranchOut app seems to be trying to leverage Facebook for business (although I am pretty wary of BranchOut – its focus seems to be on leveraging my connections to spam my friends as a condition for my access to the app). Would people just use email, Twitter and whatever else is available? How much do we need a business social network?

I also came across some really interesting LinkedIn stats in the filing:


Discover more from Paul Jacobson

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

  1. What’s happening on Link avatar

    […] Disclosures ← Majority of LinkedIn’s users don’t actually use LinkedIn […]

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.