I have been staring at this post from Read/Write Web about Google as a semantic search engine for a couple days now. It is a pretty interesting take on Google in the context of the Semantic Web thread. A lot of it has to do with the way Google offers alternative search parameters. An example given in the post is a search on the term “citizen” which yielded the following result as part of the search results (I’m not too sure where this came from though):

Whether Google is considered a semantic search engine really depends on your definition of “semantic” in the context of the Web and a search engine specifically. It is clear from the post that there are differing interpretations of the semantic web and what constitutes the semantic web and this would play into your thinking about this.

The conclusion of the post is a mixed one. On one hand Google demonstrates elements of what could be expected from a semantic search engine and on the other hand it isn’t quite there yet. I wonder if becoming a semantic search engine isn’t perhaps as a result of more evolved search algorithms – as the algorithms become more advanced, meaning begins to seep into the search results and the whole system begins to learn what we find meaningful in particular contexts.

Technorati Tags:
, , , ,


Discover more from Paul Jacobson

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

What do you think?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.