It's a Friday morning, just gone 7am. I've been out and walked the dogs, fed them & am making breakfast for the family before i head off to work. Like millions of other people I'm on the home stretch: it's finally Friday.
Under the current deal with Microsoft, Israel pays about $27 million a year for Office on the desktop, Windows, and server software being used across the government. The ministry issued a bold statement, saying “This will also encourage government ministries to re-examine their needs of using Microsoft technology or switch to other technology alternatives.”
Open source solutions are worth exploring. I’d love to see Israel adopt something like LibreOffice, especially for schools where PowerPoint slides have become the default choice for notices.
I think Linux also makes a lot of sense for most people who just default to Windows because their computers come with it (albeit at a cost).
Schools, in particular, shouldn’t be sitting with PCs running Windows 2000. They can probably revitalise their old PCs with a lightweight Linux distro, and give kids an opportunity to use them for more than just gaming.
Certainly a switch like this is only possible with an investment, but the longer term benefits must outweigh the initial costs.
This has been doing the rounds. The story is how the Polish First Lady snubbed President Trump. That may not have been her intention. At the same time, he clearly expected to have his hand shook before his wife. His expression is priceless.
Israel is a complicated place. The perennial question is how to achieve peace with our neighbours? That question begs another question: what Palestinians ultimately want from Israel? Alwyn Lau answered that question in his article “What do Palestinians want from Israel?” in MalayMail Online recently:
From my conversations with people who support Palestine, the answers usually remain non-specific. It would appear the only precise “demand” which would satisfy their notions of justice would be for Israel to give back ALL the land to the Palestinians.
In other words, the only solution on the table would be for Israel to cease existing as a state in Palestine.
I didn’t know that former Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians such broad terms in exchange for peace back in 2000. The proposal was probably accompanied by a requirement that the Palestinians acknowledge the State of Israel and commit to peace, both of which were probably deal breakers for Arafat.
Israel’s critics focus so heavily on the distorted narrative created by the BDS and its allies, that they completely ignore the efforts made to achieve peace in the last 70+ years.
The thing is, we aren’t going to just throw our hands up in the air, admit defeat, and sacrifice ourselves and our homeland. We will continue to raise our families, build our communities, and preserve our connection to our home (unless, of course, we destroy ourselves from within).
In the meantime, peace will continue to elude us. But we can live with that. Literally.
Reading Dave Winer’s post, I can’t help but think that this quote could just as easily be about what has happened to South Africa (like this, for example).
Now you have to connect the dots. Find more meetings later in the summer and into the fall. Collusion is hardly the issue. Whether they broke the law, not the issue. They sold out our country. That should piss everyone off.
Such blatant corruption at the top doesn’t seem to be limited to so-called “Third World Countries” anymore.
America is still wading through misdirection and denials from its leadership. At some point it will find itself at a crossroads: either accept this blatant corruption or hold its leaders to account.
I am just as doubtful that the ANC will take real steps to remove the rot that has eaten away at South Africa as I am that Trump and his administration will be held accountable for their actions.
Warnings about American fascism have been rife since Donald Trump’s election as President of the United States of America.
20th century writers warned about the rise of someone like Trump and it seems that their fears are being realized.
It is difficult not to see why so many are concerned if you just consider Trump’s first few weeks in office. His executive orders have challenged the foundations of one of the world’s most distinctive democracies to the point where commentators are warning about an impending constitutional crisis over his controversial travel bans.
In 1944, an article called “American Fascism” appeared in the New York Times, written by then vice president Henry Wallace. “A fascist,” wrote Wallace, “is one whose lust for money or power is combined with such an intensity of intolerance toward those of other races, parties, classes, religions, cultures, regions or nations as to make him ruthless in his use of deceit or violence to attain his ends.” Wallace predicted that American fascism would only become “really dangerous” if a “purposeful coalition” arose between crony capitalists, “poisoners of public information” and “the KKK type of demagoguery”. Those defending the new administration insist it isn’t fascism, but Americanism. This, too, was foretold: in 1938, a New York Times reporter warned: “When and if fascism comes to America it will not be labelled ‘made in Germany’; it will not be marked with a swastika; it will not even be called fascism; it will be called, of course, ‘Americanism’.”
As Trump settles in to his new role, I think we will see many more parallels between his actions and fictional despots and fascists. Whether he will utterly subvert America’s democratic safeguards remains to be seen but the initial indications are not particularly promising.
Is Donald Trump fulfilling numerous prophecies of the rise of American fascism that were published in the first half of the 20th century? It certainly seems to be happening. Even if it isn't, those predictions are worth paying attention to.