I am primarily a litigation attorney, it is what I have done for almost seven years and is an area of practice I know best. While there are many attendances that can be billed using fixed costs, many of my attendances are time-based. An example is time spent preparing applications to court and even court appearances themselves. How do you place a value on an indeterminate attendance? I could spend an hour in court waiting to be heard or I could wait all day only to have my matter postponed or held over to another day. In a similar vein, it could take me an hour to draft a substantial application or it could take me a week’s worth of detailed consultations and intricate drafting to prepare an application for counsel to consider. Obviously the fee must be proportionate to the work done and to the value added to my client’s case. It must be fair to both my client and to me (after all, like you I have a home to maintain a family to support).
The Greatest American Lawyer has recently posted on this topic. I agree with his thoughts:
Billing system which puts a value on a lawyers time, irrespective of whether the lawyers used his/her time well or provided any value for that time, puts many of the wrong incentives in play for the lawyer. The lawyer’s incentive is to take more not less time what does the lawyer care. He/She gets paid for every hour irrespective of whether or not he/she is efficient, productive or focused. Since the lawyers business model is built on generating hours irrespective of others factors, the lawyers incentive is to drag a matter out rather than bring it to resolution which cuts off his/her revenue stream.
I don’t know the answer just yet. I am working on it and you can be sure the more I do the closer I am to that goal of a total value-based billing system.
Technorati Tags: legal services, hourly fees, value-based billing
What do you think?